Wednesday, November 9, 2016
President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump, President Donald Trump, President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump, President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump.
Sorry, I just get can't get a grasp on that.
Something is very very wrong here...
It is one thing to disagree with a choice of President. I disliked Reagan, weird choice. I disliked Bush Junior intensely, but I never considered him a COMPLETE idiot. And surely not evil.
Trump is evil, sick, and psychotic. And I have 2 choices. Stay the 4 years or leave. I am exploring leaving.
And it is not so much Trump, it is the people who elected him. Nations thrive and eventually fade. History teaches us that. This election may represent the end of America.
In the 1930s, many smart people left Germany and the surrounding nations, thinking that bad things were coming. This might be a similar time...
I am looking at immigration rules for Canada and Australia. I am prepared to sell everything I own, keep personal stuff, and move. Because I don't want to live in a country that thinks Donald Trump is a good choice as a leader.
Leaving your country is scary. But my ancestors did, and for similar reasons. I don't know if I have the same bravery they did. I'll find out.
In a sense, nothing President Trump does will affect me much. I have a retirement annuity, I don't actively engage in politics, I keep a low profile, and I am not much known on the internet. Just doing nothing would be safe.
But I can't do "nothing".
Still, I'm between horrified and "sick" about this travesty of an election. The people chose, and that is what democracy IS. So do I flee or fight?
My initial shock is over. I've talked myself a way through it. What do I do tomorrow to end the Trumpism?
I guess I have my answer. I had to work through it.
President Donald Trump, President Donald Trump, President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump, President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump.
Sorry, I just get can't get a grasp on that.
Something is very very wrong here...
It is one thing to disagree with a choice of President. I disliked Reagan, weird choice. I disliked Bush Junior intensely, but I never considered him a COMPLETE idiot. And surely not evil.
Trump is evil, sick, and psychotic. And I have 2 choices. Stay the 4 years or leave. I am exploring leaving.
And it is not so much Trump, it is the people who elected him. Nations thrive and eventually fade. History teaches us that. This election may represent the end of America.
In the 1930s, many smart people left Germany and the surrounding nations, thinking that bad things were coming. This might be a similar time...
I am looking at immigration rules for Canada and Australia. I am prepared to sell everything I own, keep personal stuff, and move. Because I don't want to live in a country that thinks Donald Trump is a good choice as a leader.
Leaving your country is scary. But my ancestors did, and for similar reasons. I don't know if I have the same bravery they did. I'll find out.
In a sense, nothing President Trump does will affect me much. I have a retirement annuity, I don't actively engage in politics, I keep a low profile, and I am not much known on the internet. Just doing nothing would be safe.
But I can't do "nothing".
Still, I'm between horrified and "sick" about this travesty of an election. The people chose, and that is what democracy IS. So do I flee or fight?
My initial shock is over. I've talked myself a way through it. What do I do tomorrow to end the Trumpism?
I guess I have my answer. I had to work through it.
Election Results
I am ashamed more than I ever thought I could be. I never thought it possible that such a person as Donald Trump could lead our nation. I have disliked some elected presidents, like George Bush the Shrub, as being an embarrassment.
Trump goes beyond all bounds of decency and obvious leadership failure.
Which means my fellow citizens are failing in the basic requirements of choosing leaders who have ANY basic leadership skills.
The next 4 years, and maybe 8, are going to be a period of utter insanity and inanity in the US. I won't accept the guilt. I tried in many discussions and discussion boards to warn my fellow citizens about his insanity. I failed.
Apparently, the majority of Americans are very angry about the world. That is not a good thing for the world. Anger combined with power is very very bad.
I sort of saw it coming, but I didn't see it coming so fast. America is breaking up. I was hoping I would die of old age before it happened.
I am considering leaving the US. I want to live in a more liberal and peaceful place. Another option is to move to where I can basically go "off the grid" locally.
I'm retired, I get an annuity, I have savings. I could simply ignore almost anything Trump could do.
I bet Canada, Australia, and England are getting a lot of questions today about immigration requirements. I never thought it would come to this.
The "Pax America" is over.
I am reminded that through history, the people who dare to leave a failing place are the smartest ones. They take chances in better places. I'm not sure that makes sense to me at 66. But I'm giving it real thought.
I have a few months to decide what to do. But I don't expect to be blogging like I used to. My heart isn't in it. The idea of not wanting to be part of my country again is too distressing. A country of people who want a leader like Trump is not a place I want to be.
Trump goes beyond all bounds of decency and obvious leadership failure.
Which means my fellow citizens are failing in the basic requirements of choosing leaders who have ANY basic leadership skills.
The next 4 years, and maybe 8, are going to be a period of utter insanity and inanity in the US. I won't accept the guilt. I tried in many discussions and discussion boards to warn my fellow citizens about his insanity. I failed.
Apparently, the majority of Americans are very angry about the world. That is not a good thing for the world. Anger combined with power is very very bad.
I sort of saw it coming, but I didn't see it coming so fast. America is breaking up. I was hoping I would die of old age before it happened.
I am considering leaving the US. I want to live in a more liberal and peaceful place. Another option is to move to where I can basically go "off the grid" locally.
I'm retired, I get an annuity, I have savings. I could simply ignore almost anything Trump could do.
I bet Canada, Australia, and England are getting a lot of questions today about immigration requirements. I never thought it would come to this.
The "Pax America" is over.
I am reminded that through history, the people who dare to leave a failing place are the smartest ones. They take chances in better places. I'm not sure that makes sense to me at 66. But I'm giving it real thought.
I have a few months to decide what to do. But I don't expect to be blogging like I used to. My heart isn't in it. The idea of not wanting to be part of my country again is too distressing. A country of people who want a leader like Trump is not a place I want to be.
Election Results
I am withdrawing from posting for a while. I do not respect the majority of my fellow citizens. I have to think about this.
Tuesday, November 8, 2016
VOTED!
So much trouble...
Walked in and went directly to the registration desk. 30 seconds...
Went directly to the ballot desk. 15 seconds...
Went directly to a voting booth. Filled in some circles, 60 seconds...
Went directly to a scanner which read and stored my ballot. 10 seconds...
Received my "I Voted"sticker, 5 seconds...
Total time spent voting, 2:00 minutes...
I could have almost held my breath the entire time!
UPDATE 3pm: I voted at about 1pm today, ran some minor errends, and went home. Where I did some minor yardwork. That was mostly laying traps for the last generation of mosquitoes for the year. I set out a bucket of water in some shrubs last week and checked it every day to see if there were larvae.
There were some today, so I dumped THEM on the ground to die and set out 6 small inviting containers nestled down into groundplants and sprinkled some mosquito bT into each one with some water. This bT is a bacteria that specifically attacks moqsuito larvae. If you see anything called "mosquito doughnuts, that's the stuff. It is about 100% effective. Used at the very end of the year, it REALLY cuts down on their start next year.
Update 6pm: There won't be any election information for an hour, so I made dinner. Full of nervous energy, I did too much cooking. I cooked a 1.5" Del Monico steak, corn on the cob, a potato that I fried in the steak fat, a tossed salad in 1,000 island dressing, stir-fried mushrooms and onion and red bell pepper, and some fresh spinach. Too much to eat for me, but half of everything was fine. The rest tomorrow.
Whenever I'm not sure what to do, I cook. Some people clean, others read, I cook.
Update 10pm: The election results are too close to be predictive. CNN breathlessly announced that Trump was leading Clinton in North Carolina - with 1% of the vote in. That is both utterly meaningless AND maddening. I turned the TV OFF! I will wait to see meaningful results later.
I did some USEFUL work finding out what self-propelled surface-level brushcutters cost to rent for a day at the local Home Depot (only $94 per day) and confirmed that they have at least one to rent.
I also have a serious gas roto-tiller and a mower than won't start, so I checked on the most likely problems and how to fix them. Basically, I suspect the problem is old gas. I haven't used either in several years. That is "medium" easy to fix.
Take a couple parts loose and spray the cleaner in usually does it. And if it doesn't solve the problem, there is a local repair shop that does good work. I have a trailer to deliver them.
Meanwhile, I would still prefer to hire someone to do the brushcutting and debris removal (especially because they are mostly brambles and briars). I'll accept any reasonable quote. But it is good to know what the actual equipment cost is. $94 per day rental is a LOT lower than what I expected.
Update 12:30am. I am horrified. It looks like Trump might win. I do not comprehend this. Fortunately, there are some uncertain States to go. It was just reported that Canada is postponing immigration requests from US citizens. So they don't make rash decisions, I suppose. Good idea.
Personally. I'm not sure what I would do if Trump wins. More about that if it happens.
Walked in and went directly to the registration desk. 30 seconds...
Went directly to the ballot desk. 15 seconds...
Went directly to a voting booth. Filled in some circles, 60 seconds...
Went directly to a scanner which read and stored my ballot. 10 seconds...
Received my "I Voted"sticker, 5 seconds...
Total time spent voting, 2:00 minutes...
I could have almost held my breath the entire time!
UPDATE 3pm: I voted at about 1pm today, ran some minor errends, and went home. Where I did some minor yardwork. That was mostly laying traps for the last generation of mosquitoes for the year. I set out a bucket of water in some shrubs last week and checked it every day to see if there were larvae.
There were some today, so I dumped THEM on the ground to die and set out 6 small inviting containers nestled down into groundplants and sprinkled some mosquito bT into each one with some water. This bT is a bacteria that specifically attacks moqsuito larvae. If you see anything called "mosquito doughnuts, that's the stuff. It is about 100% effective. Used at the very end of the year, it REALLY cuts down on their start next year.
Update 6pm: There won't be any election information for an hour, so I made dinner. Full of nervous energy, I did too much cooking. I cooked a 1.5" Del Monico steak, corn on the cob, a potato that I fried in the steak fat, a tossed salad in 1,000 island dressing, stir-fried mushrooms and onion and red bell pepper, and some fresh spinach. Too much to eat for me, but half of everything was fine. The rest tomorrow.
Whenever I'm not sure what to do, I cook. Some people clean, others read, I cook.
Update 10pm: The election results are too close to be predictive. CNN breathlessly announced that Trump was leading Clinton in North Carolina - with 1% of the vote in. That is both utterly meaningless AND maddening. I turned the TV OFF! I will wait to see meaningful results later.
I did some USEFUL work finding out what self-propelled surface-level brushcutters cost to rent for a day at the local Home Depot (only $94 per day) and confirmed that they have at least one to rent.
I also have a serious gas roto-tiller and a mower than won't start, so I checked on the most likely problems and how to fix them. Basically, I suspect the problem is old gas. I haven't used either in several years. That is "medium" easy to fix.
Take a couple parts loose and spray the cleaner in usually does it. And if it doesn't solve the problem, there is a local repair shop that does good work. I have a trailer to deliver them.
Meanwhile, I would still prefer to hire someone to do the brushcutting and debris removal (especially because they are mostly brambles and briars). I'll accept any reasonable quote. But it is good to know what the actual equipment cost is. $94 per day rental is a LOT lower than what I expected.
Update 12:30am. I am horrified. It looks like Trump might win. I do not comprehend this. Fortunately, there are some uncertain States to go. It was just reported that Canada is postponing immigration requests from US citizens. So they don't make rash decisions, I suppose. Good idea.
Personally. I'm not sure what I would do if Trump wins. More about that if it happens.
Monday, November 7, 2016
3rd Yardwork Project
The other major thing I want to do this Fall is move the surviving fancy hostas from the open front yard to the fenced back yard where the deer can't get at them.
The fancier they are, the more the deer seem to like them. The good ones are marked with landscaping flags. So where the impatiens and coleus have grown this year, there will be the best hostas. The others will go into a 50'x6' long bed where there are some empty spots over the years.
I will be moving the numerous Japanese Painted Ferns all around after the far back yard gets cleared of blackberries in a week or two.. They seem to like it here and spread well.
The place where the fancier hostas will go is a framed area around my sunken patio. And there is a reason. I was in a carpool for years that met at a spot where hostas were up at stomach level. I loved the effect. I am replicating it.
Most will be Captain Kirk and June
With Blue Cadet
And small gold drop all around.
The deer DON'T seem to like the large rough-leaved 'Sum and Substance' and 'Big Daddy' hostas. So I will be dividing them and filling the spaces in the front where I am taking out the other hostas.
I prefer to deter them from eating my plants passively. But I will set up a motion-detector strobe light to drive them away. And if that doesn't work. I can sit quietly in a blind in the corner of my yard with a crossbow. Deer need to relearn to be afraid of humans again.
The fancier they are, the more the deer seem to like them. The good ones are marked with landscaping flags. So where the impatiens and coleus have grown this year, there will be the best hostas. The others will go into a 50'x6' long bed where there are some empty spots over the years.
I will be moving the numerous Japanese Painted Ferns all around after the far back yard gets cleared of blackberries in a week or two.. They seem to like it here and spread well.
The place where the fancier hostas will go is a framed area around my sunken patio. And there is a reason. I was in a carpool for years that met at a spot where hostas were up at stomach level. I loved the effect. I am replicating it.
Most will be Captain Kirk and June
With Blue Cadet
And small gold drop all around.
The deer DON'T seem to like the large rough-leaved 'Sum and Substance' and 'Big Daddy' hostas. So I will be dividing them and filling the spaces in the front where I am taking out the other hostas.
I prefer to deter them from eating my plants passively. But I will set up a motion-detector strobe light to drive them away. And if that doesn't work. I can sit quietly in a blind in the corner of my yard with a crossbow. Deer need to relearn to be afraid of humans again.
Sunday, November 6, 2016
2nd Yardwork Project
The next most important project is the bulb bed. It is a 20' diameter edged circle. I planted 100 tulips there in wire cages (to protect them from voles) last year. They looked great this Spring. I also had 200 daffodils of 2 varieties (one early and one late). Voles don't bother daffs, so that was just drilling holes with an auger and setting them in.
I ordered more daffs for this year. 50 more each of the existing ones and 150 of a different one for the unused space in the circle.
I should have marked the space where the existing daffs were planted. Well, you know, you think you won't forget exactly where they are but you do. I have pictures, so I should be able to guess pretty well where to plant more of the same ones safely. And where I can start planting the new ones next to them. I HOPE, LOL!
But over the Summer, weeds grew. I want a clean planting area for all the new bulbs. My gas powered roto-tiller is just too big for the area, so I bought a small 10' tiller.
I tried it out today. What a disaster! Every grass leaf and root wrapped around the tiller blades 2 10' rows and the things was stuffed like a hard ball of cotton. It took 20 minutes to pull them all out. But it did do a decent job of tearing up the soil an inch deep, which was exactly what I wanted. But that was way too slow and difficult.
So I used my electric string-trimmer to beat down all the long grass leaves. That was an amazing 3 wheelbarrowfuls of plant debris!
So I tried the little electric tiller again. It was actually worse. The previous use has a lot of grass leaves in it, this time it was all roots. It took 30 minutes to pull them all out. They get wrapped and tangled very tightly.
So that wasn't the way to go. The little electric tiller is great for small areas of bare dirt. But it doesn't chop up roots.
So I raked off all the weed-whacked debris. Then I decided to pull out the serious tiller. It is kind of big for the job. I couldn't get it to start. So I thought about mowing the area. I can use the drill auger to make holes for all the new daffs if weeds are down to ground level. I couldn't get the push mower to start. Last option was the riding mower but that is really awkward changing from forward to reverse (you have to stop the blade each change).
So Monday, I bring the gas rototiller and the gas push mower to a repairshop. There is a good local one. Fair prices. I hope they aren't busy.
And then I can get back to MY interests which is USING the equipment to do things I need doing.
I ordered more daffs for this year. 50 more each of the existing ones and 150 of a different one for the unused space in the circle.
I should have marked the space where the existing daffs were planted. Well, you know, you think you won't forget exactly where they are but you do. I have pictures, so I should be able to guess pretty well where to plant more of the same ones safely. And where I can start planting the new ones next to them. I HOPE, LOL!
But over the Summer, weeds grew. I want a clean planting area for all the new bulbs. My gas powered roto-tiller is just too big for the area, so I bought a small 10' tiller.
I tried it out today. What a disaster! Every grass leaf and root wrapped around the tiller blades 2 10' rows and the things was stuffed like a hard ball of cotton. It took 20 minutes to pull them all out. But it did do a decent job of tearing up the soil an inch deep, which was exactly what I wanted. But that was way too slow and difficult.
So I used my electric string-trimmer to beat down all the long grass leaves. That was an amazing 3 wheelbarrowfuls of plant debris!
So I tried the little electric tiller again. It was actually worse. The previous use has a lot of grass leaves in it, this time it was all roots. It took 30 minutes to pull them all out. They get wrapped and tangled very tightly.
So that wasn't the way to go. The little electric tiller is great for small areas of bare dirt. But it doesn't chop up roots.
So I raked off all the weed-whacked debris. Then I decided to pull out the serious tiller. It is kind of big for the job. I couldn't get it to start. So I thought about mowing the area. I can use the drill auger to make holes for all the new daffs if weeds are down to ground level. I couldn't get the push mower to start. Last option was the riding mower but that is really awkward changing from forward to reverse (you have to stop the blade each change).
So Monday, I bring the gas rototiller and the gas push mower to a repairshop. There is a good local one. Fair prices. I hope they aren't busy.
And then I can get back to MY interests which is USING the equipment to do things I need doing.
Saturday, November 5, 2016
Yardwork
The approach of Winter is pushing me to get some yardwork done. My knee is about back to normal as long as don't kneel on something hard (walking is general fine again even stairs feel normal).
I have several projects to complete. The major one is a 1/3 of the backyard that has become overgrown with ivy, volunteer saplings, and blackberries. What a weird combination!
I attacked it 2x this week. I can cut down the saplings with loppers (a few demand a saw), but getting at the blackberries is horrible. They drape over in a circle, so every one I cut HAS to fall on me and grabs my skin and clothes like an angry cat. I was spending more time getting each individual came loose from me than cutting them.
The area is 50'x65' and that is not going to work. The job requires EQUIPMENT! I priced those glorified gas-powered ground surface hedge-trimmers and decent ones start at $2500. Not the best idea for something I'm not likely to use again. So I called a couple of brush-hoggers.
One came by today. He just cuts everything off at groundlevel. A high-powered mowing and debris removal service. That might be good enough depending on the price. With that, I would have a clear area. I have a good roto-tiller and used it back there once.
It's rough work, but if all that is left is 1" stubs and roots, it WILL tear them out and a regular mower will keep them cropped until the roots are exhausted and die. I can handle THAT.
I would PREFER someone to come in with a small bulldozer and scrape the soil a couple inches deep, remove the plant debris, them spread the soil out smoothly. I haven't found someone to do that yet.
Landscapers want to turn everything into lawn or planted areas with their own shrubs and flowers. I don't want that.
Excavators just want to flatten everything in sight and leave the debris in place. They really don't want to mess with removing piles of brambles.
Part of the problem is that it is a tricky area. There is a 9' diameter pond needing a new liner and a 40' water raceway uphill that flows pumped water down into the pond. They don't want to get close to that.
I may have to take what I can get and try to do what I can afterwards. But at least on this, I am willing to pay someone to do the rough work.
This is all because I had some trees that were shading my garden removed. As some as they were removed, the space under them received a lot more sunlight. I knew I had ivy around, but the blackberries were a complete surprise. They just erupted out of no where. I assume the tree shade prevented them from growing before.
So here is my plan. I have five 2' tall specimen trees (2 korean dogwoods and 3 sourwoods) that should grow only about 20' high. They won't shade my garden. But they shold shade the ground around them to replace the shade that kept the blackberries and ivy from growing. The ground under the older taller junk trees was nearly bare. I'm hoping for a return to that.
I will help the 5 specimen trees grow by surrounding them with scrap carpet. Carpet lets water through but not plants up. I done that with many shrubs and trees and it works great.
The trees I bought are not yet dormant. I water them every couple of days waiting for the cold weather.
If it works, I will have lovely Spring and Fall small trees in the back, no wild growth, and no new shade on the garden.
I have several projects to complete. The major one is a 1/3 of the backyard that has become overgrown with ivy, volunteer saplings, and blackberries. What a weird combination!
I attacked it 2x this week. I can cut down the saplings with loppers (a few demand a saw), but getting at the blackberries is horrible. They drape over in a circle, so every one I cut HAS to fall on me and grabs my skin and clothes like an angry cat. I was spending more time getting each individual came loose from me than cutting them.
The area is 50'x65' and that is not going to work. The job requires EQUIPMENT! I priced those glorified gas-powered ground surface hedge-trimmers and decent ones start at $2500. Not the best idea for something I'm not likely to use again. So I called a couple of brush-hoggers.
One came by today. He just cuts everything off at groundlevel. A high-powered mowing and debris removal service. That might be good enough depending on the price. With that, I would have a clear area. I have a good roto-tiller and used it back there once.
It's rough work, but if all that is left is 1" stubs and roots, it WILL tear them out and a regular mower will keep them cropped until the roots are exhausted and die. I can handle THAT.
I would PREFER someone to come in with a small bulldozer and scrape the soil a couple inches deep, remove the plant debris, them spread the soil out smoothly. I haven't found someone to do that yet.
Landscapers want to turn everything into lawn or planted areas with their own shrubs and flowers. I don't want that.
Excavators just want to flatten everything in sight and leave the debris in place. They really don't want to mess with removing piles of brambles.
Part of the problem is that it is a tricky area. There is a 9' diameter pond needing a new liner and a 40' water raceway uphill that flows pumped water down into the pond. They don't want to get close to that.
I may have to take what I can get and try to do what I can afterwards. But at least on this, I am willing to pay someone to do the rough work.
This is all because I had some trees that were shading my garden removed. As some as they were removed, the space under them received a lot more sunlight. I knew I had ivy around, but the blackberries were a complete surprise. They just erupted out of no where. I assume the tree shade prevented them from growing before.
So here is my plan. I have five 2' tall specimen trees (2 korean dogwoods and 3 sourwoods) that should grow only about 20' high. They won't shade my garden. But they shold shade the ground around them to replace the shade that kept the blackberries and ivy from growing. The ground under the older taller junk trees was nearly bare. I'm hoping for a return to that.
I will help the 5 specimen trees grow by surrounding them with scrap carpet. Carpet lets water through but not plants up. I done that with many shrubs and trees and it works great.
The trees I bought are not yet dormant. I water them every couple of days waiting for the cold weather.
If it works, I will have lovely Spring and Fall small trees in the back, no wild growth, and no new shade on the garden.
Thursday, November 3, 2016
More Political Silliness And Illogic Comment
I received a comment from Angel Abbygrace's Mom in response to the original post. The comment is detailed and it is valued. And I don't want to change a normally personal and friendly blog into a heated discussion in the stress of the last week of an angry and partisan political campaign.
But a response is deserved, and I'll put hers it italics for ease of identification. And unless noted otherwise, I will accept the accuracy of her statements (this is not Fox News, after all, and we are not competing talking heads. She is a friend whom I respect).
And unless otherwise noted I am commenting on her quote, not her conclusions FROM the quote.
As she quoted, From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
"Chains" are series of emails on the same subject. They can, as we all well know, contain many subjects varying widely as the "chain" goes on. What starts as a chain can be about personal family matters, get into a brief argument about politics and then go right back to family matters.
In this case, I see that there are some numbers that seem to have meaning and some that do not. "110 emails in 52 email chains" sounds like a whole lot. Many people will multiply 110 by 52 and think "about 55,000 emails". No. It is still only 110 out of the original 30,000 emails.
That is "not many".
The numbers of emails that were "sent or received" is deceptive. It is not a crime to receive improperly-marked classified information. If I sent anyone of my friends classified information not properly marked as such, you would not be guilty of anything. *I* might, IF I knew the information was classified.
The question is whether the information in the emails was known to either of us.
From what I understand, most of the emails considered to include classified information fell into 3 categories.
First, there was information not classified at the time but classified at a later date. You are not guilty of handling information that was classified LATER! Such as, if you take a medication today and the Government declares it illegal next month, you can't be charged.
And even with classified information, there is a "lag time". If some agency declares "Fact X" classified today and you refer to it tomorrow before you are told about that, you aren't guilty of anything.
It gets worse. Suppose Agency A declares Fact A classified and Agency B says it isn't? You still aren't guilty because there is reasonable doubt.
Second, classified information has to be properly identified. In the movies, every classified document has a big red "CLASSIFIED" stamped at the top. And maybe they do. But they don't always show up that way in emails. I have seen claims by seemingly objective sources that WHEN a classified email or attachment in an email was sent to Clinton, there was simply a large "C" at the end.
And there are 2 problems with that one. If you only learn the information was classified AFTER you read it, there isn't much you can do to forget it. And a "C" is not the same as a "classified" stamp...
Third, most of the information that is being challenged was "upclassified", meaning it was classified only after recent review by one Federal Agency or another and at a later date than the emails. And if anyone has to choose between classifying information and NOT classifying it, it gets classified.
If my job was classifying documents, I would classify my office softball team schedule rather than make a mistake. Because the is no penalty for over-classifying docoments, but a HUGE one for not when you should have.
Which leads me to my last 2 point, which I will combine. Just because a document is classified doesn't mean it should be. Just how many secrets to you think we have from the Russians and Chinese? I think it was Kissinger who said that the only Nations we can keep secrets from are our Allies. And apparently, we can't even do that anymore.
So I ALMOST question our whole habit of secrecy. The only people who DON'T know US government secrets are the US citizens, LOL!
From AbbyGrace's Mom: "The Top Secret email chains alone should set off alarm bells whether you support or don't support HRC as a candidate. If you had sent or received classified email on your own private server while working in the Government do you think the FBI would have been as lenient to you?"
HRC has about the highest clearance. I don't.
"Also from the director's statement: Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
"Careless" is not the same as "illegal". If one classified person mentioned classified information to another privately at a party, that is not illegal, but it is careless.
"One other note on classification from the Director: But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it"
At a certain level, probably almost anything could be classified. And you have to be able to talk to people in real time without having staff research every fact for classification status. I suspect that our classified system has gotten way out of anyone's ability to keep within the rules.
I bet I could find half of the US classified information on the internet without trying too hard. I think the whole classified argument is a mountain made from a molehill.
Not that some information shouldn't be classified, but that most shouldn't.
And let me finish by saying again, no harshness, just my best answers to a good comment...
But a response is deserved, and I'll put hers it italics for ease of identification. And unless noted otherwise, I will accept the accuracy of her statements (this is not Fox News, after all, and we are not competing talking heads. She is a friend whom I respect).
And unless otherwise noted I am commenting on her quote, not her conclusions FROM the quote.
As she quoted, From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
"Chains" are series of emails on the same subject. They can, as we all well know, contain many subjects varying widely as the "chain" goes on. What starts as a chain can be about personal family matters, get into a brief argument about politics and then go right back to family matters.
In this case, I see that there are some numbers that seem to have meaning and some that do not. "110 emails in 52 email chains" sounds like a whole lot. Many people will multiply 110 by 52 and think "about 55,000 emails". No. It is still only 110 out of the original 30,000 emails.
That is "not many".
The numbers of emails that were "sent or received" is deceptive. It is not a crime to receive improperly-marked classified information. If I sent anyone of my friends classified information not properly marked as such, you would not be guilty of anything. *I* might, IF I knew the information was classified.
The question is whether the information in the emails was known to either of us.
From what I understand, most of the emails considered to include classified information fell into 3 categories.
First, there was information not classified at the time but classified at a later date. You are not guilty of handling information that was classified LATER! Such as, if you take a medication today and the Government declares it illegal next month, you can't be charged.
And even with classified information, there is a "lag time". If some agency declares "Fact X" classified today and you refer to it tomorrow before you are told about that, you aren't guilty of anything.
It gets worse. Suppose Agency A declares Fact A classified and Agency B says it isn't? You still aren't guilty because there is reasonable doubt.
Second, classified information has to be properly identified. In the movies, every classified document has a big red "CLASSIFIED" stamped at the top. And maybe they do. But they don't always show up that way in emails. I have seen claims by seemingly objective sources that WHEN a classified email or attachment in an email was sent to Clinton, there was simply a large "C" at the end.
And there are 2 problems with that one. If you only learn the information was classified AFTER you read it, there isn't much you can do to forget it. And a "C" is not the same as a "classified" stamp...
Third, most of the information that is being challenged was "upclassified", meaning it was classified only after recent review by one Federal Agency or another and at a later date than the emails. And if anyone has to choose between classifying information and NOT classifying it, it gets classified.
If my job was classifying documents, I would classify my office softball team schedule rather than make a mistake. Because the is no penalty for over-classifying docoments, but a HUGE one for not when you should have.
Which leads me to my last 2 point, which I will combine. Just because a document is classified doesn't mean it should be. Just how many secrets to you think we have from the Russians and Chinese? I think it was Kissinger who said that the only Nations we can keep secrets from are our Allies. And apparently, we can't even do that anymore.
So I ALMOST question our whole habit of secrecy. The only people who DON'T know US government secrets are the US citizens, LOL!
From AbbyGrace's Mom: "The Top Secret email chains alone should set off alarm bells whether you support or don't support HRC as a candidate. If you had sent or received classified email on your own private server while working in the Government do you think the FBI would have been as lenient to you?"
HRC has about the highest clearance. I don't.
"Also from the director's statement: Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
"Careless" is not the same as "illegal". If one classified person mentioned classified information to another privately at a party, that is not illegal, but it is careless.
"One other note on classification from the Director: But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it"
At a certain level, probably almost anything could be classified. And you have to be able to talk to people in real time without having staff research every fact for classification status. I suspect that our classified system has gotten way out of anyone's ability to keep within the rules.
I bet I could find half of the US classified information on the internet without trying too hard. I think the whole classified argument is a mountain made from a molehill.
Not that some information shouldn't be classified, but that most shouldn't.
And let me finish by saying again, no harshness, just my best answers to a good comment...
Saturday, October 29, 2016
More Political Silliness And Illogic
This is partly about "the political games" but also about the illogic and careless language used by the talking heads on TV. And I don't like either side of both issues!
First, the "the political games". The Facts: FBI Director Comey sent a letter to "Congress advising them that more emails were found that might involve their previous committee investigations, as he had promised to do if new information was discovered. No specific information was included, and he noted that the possibilility of misunderstanding.
The basis of concern is that Huma Abedin (wife of Anthony Weiner of sexting shame-fame) is an associate of Clinton and there MIGHT be some Clinton emails not yet discovered. She used a family laptop to send some emails to Clinton. The content has not been made public at this time is not known at this time. Nothing suggesting anything improper has been offerred.
The FBI, after reviewing all the emails on Clinton's server, has found nothing of concern and closed the investigation months ago. A very few emails with classified information were sent TO her without proper notifications. Her replies were lawful; if you don't know received information was classified, YOU are not at fault. The FBI said so.
OK. As far as I can think, if Huma sent Clinton any emails, they are on Clinton's email system and already examined by the FBI. This starts to look like the Kevin Bacon game. Can you connect anyone socially unacceptable to Clinton? LOL!
As far as I can tell now, the letter was addressed TO House Committee Chairman, all Republican of course. I will explain something about the details of Government letter-writing. There is "TO", there is "cc" (courtesy copy), and there is "bcc" (blind courtesy copy) just like on emails.
Only in Government letters, the cc and bcc is not on the original TO letter. The "TO" recipients do not know about the cc and bcc list unless they ask for a file copy of the letter. The cc list does not know about the "bcc" list unless they ask (and the originators admit to it).
So, unless things have changed (and they might have - I've been retired for10 years), the Republican Committee saw only that they had been sent the letter, the Democratic minority leaders saw they had been sent a copy of the letter to the Republican Chairmen, and only Comey and his staff know who got sent a bcc copy (bcc's are usually sent only to internal staff who need to know about such things for media questions and file-keeping.
Is that confusing enough? I spent 30 years in Government and got very used to those kinds of subtleties, LOL! It all makes sense to me! LOL!
Second, the talking heads discussions...
Everyone I heard on MSNBC and CNN got it all WRONG! Clinton mentioned the Comey letter send to the Republican Committee Chairmen. As usual, she was utterly technically correct. The letter was indeed addressed to the Republican Committee Chairmen. She said that with the same accuracy I would in discussing "TO, cc, and bcc". She understands that stuff and speaks of it accurately.
The TV talking heads did not! They said Clinton claimed the letter was sent "only" to the Republicans and casitigatd her for a deception.. The ccs were sent to the ranking Democratic Minority Leaders. But they received cc copies; they were not the original TO recipients.
Meanwhile, Clinton is saying that she would like any available information to be released ASAP, as there is noactual information in Director Comey's letter but there are suggestions. Trump, on the other hand is claiming the non-information in Comey's letter as some proof of guilt
As odd as that might seem in the real world, it matters in Government. Comey very DELIBERATELY and EXPLICITLY sent the official copies of the letter to the Republican Committee chairmen and NOT the official copies to the Democratic Ranking Members. But cc'd them to cover his ass. A true Washington wimpy asshole who needs to be removed...
Conclusion: Comey wished to try to stay out of trouble by playing it both too carefully and too ineptly. Whoever wins the Presidency, he is going to be gone for the crime of political incompetence. He can't claim it was urgent (the FBI had the information 5 weeks ago), and he can't claim any factul reason for presenting the mere statement that the FBI was investigating new information 11 days before an election.
Ex FBI officials have said there is an informal, but previously modern unbroken rule of avoiding all political statements 60 days before an election. That Comey broke that rule says a lot about his intent.
First, the "the political games". The Facts: FBI Director Comey sent a letter to "Congress advising them that more emails were found that might involve their previous committee investigations, as he had promised to do if new information was discovered. No specific information was included, and he noted that the possibilility of misunderstanding.
The basis of concern is that Huma Abedin (wife of Anthony Weiner of sexting shame-fame) is an associate of Clinton and there MIGHT be some Clinton emails not yet discovered. She used a family laptop to send some emails to Clinton. The content has not been made public at this time is not known at this time. Nothing suggesting anything improper has been offerred.
The FBI, after reviewing all the emails on Clinton's server, has found nothing of concern and closed the investigation months ago. A very few emails with classified information were sent TO her without proper notifications. Her replies were lawful; if you don't know received information was classified, YOU are not at fault. The FBI said so.
OK. As far as I can think, if Huma sent Clinton any emails, they are on Clinton's email system and already examined by the FBI. This starts to look like the Kevin Bacon game. Can you connect anyone socially unacceptable to Clinton? LOL!
As far as I can tell now, the letter was addressed TO House Committee Chairman, all Republican of course. I will explain something about the details of Government letter-writing. There is "TO", there is "cc" (courtesy copy), and there is "bcc" (blind courtesy copy) just like on emails.
Only in Government letters, the cc and bcc is not on the original TO letter. The "TO" recipients do not know about the cc and bcc list unless they ask for a file copy of the letter. The cc list does not know about the "bcc" list unless they ask (and the originators admit to it).
So, unless things have changed (and they might have - I've been retired for10 years), the Republican Committee saw only that they had been sent the letter, the Democratic minority leaders saw they had been sent a copy of the letter to the Republican Chairmen, and only Comey and his staff know who got sent a bcc copy (bcc's are usually sent only to internal staff who need to know about such things for media questions and file-keeping.
Is that confusing enough? I spent 30 years in Government and got very used to those kinds of subtleties, LOL! It all makes sense to me! LOL!
Second, the talking heads discussions...
Everyone I heard on MSNBC and CNN got it all WRONG! Clinton mentioned the Comey letter send to the Republican Committee Chairmen. As usual, she was utterly technically correct. The letter was indeed addressed to the Republican Committee Chairmen. She said that with the same accuracy I would in discussing "TO, cc, and bcc". She understands that stuff and speaks of it accurately.
The TV talking heads did not! They said Clinton claimed the letter was sent "only" to the Republicans and casitigatd her for a deception.. The ccs were sent to the ranking Democratic Minority Leaders. But they received cc copies; they were not the original TO recipients.
Meanwhile, Clinton is saying that she would like any available information to be released ASAP, as there is noactual information in Director Comey's letter but there are suggestions. Trump, on the other hand is claiming the non-information in Comey's letter as some proof of guilt
As odd as that might seem in the real world, it matters in Government. Comey very DELIBERATELY and EXPLICITLY sent the official copies of the letter to the Republican Committee chairmen and NOT the official copies to the Democratic Ranking Members. But cc'd them to cover his ass. A true Washington wimpy asshole who needs to be removed...
Conclusion: Comey wished to try to stay out of trouble by playing it both too carefully and too ineptly. Whoever wins the Presidency, he is going to be gone for the crime of political incompetence. He can't claim it was urgent (the FBI had the information 5 weeks ago), and he can't claim any factul reason for presenting the mere statement that the FBI was investigating new information 11 days before an election.
Ex FBI officials have said there is an informal, but previously modern unbroken rule of avoiding all political statements 60 days before an election. That Comey broke that rule says a lot about his intent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
A Day Late
But I wanted to remember a sad day. I remember some parts. I was only 13. I saw a lot on TV afterwards. But my most specific image is the...